PREFERENCES (Collective) 2)4)
← Back
The problem of harmonization of collective preferences has been considered by K. ARROW (1956, 1963). After his mathematical modeling work he came to the conclusion that the only methods to clearly define collective preferences from individual ones, if there is a great number of individuals, is to impose them
In MORIN's words (1999b, p. 85) there is no possibility to create a good optimizing algorithm in any human collective behavior. The definition of the major good or the least evil leads to an uncertainty that cannot be eliminated
This reflects or course the multiplicity and complexity of the shifting interactions which take place in constantly variable ways
It sheds a dispiriting light on the interrelations between cultures. It could also explain the universal need for values and norms in defining and strenghtening all kinds of social conducts (as expressed by the german term "Gleichschaltung" (= bringing into line), with its unfortunate authoritarian undertones)
But at least some help could conceivably be found in opinion inquiries and polls, even if not conclusive, nor of permanent validity.
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: