OVERSIGHT 1)3)
← Back
An unintentional and generally inadverted omission or mistake
M. MULEJ observes that the reduccionist view of issues leads frequently to a variety of intricated and unexpected consequences, that may introduce new issues, many times difficult by themselves (1991, p.316-17).
Only by applying good criteria to determine the interdependence of causes, conditions and consequences can oversights be avoided.
MULEJ also underlines the necessity to guard oneself against superficial use of pseudo-system thinking, as for example:
- mastering fictitious wholes, but no factual wholes
- thinking "holistic", but behaving and acting "fragmented"
- use simple-sided ("tunnel vision") or merely dialectical understanding and enclose oneself unwittingly into such views
- dividing conceptual labor instead of networking
According to MULEJ, problems at the planetary level, for instance, are objects of "Conferences… arranged by the United Nations and make good conclusions, but actions are blocked by single-sided, tunnel vision kinds of interests"(p.326)
In conclusion, MULEJ proposes an "ethics of interdependence"
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: